Plus, being innovative requires taking risks and being aggressive.Īrgument from Authority: It’s important to only trust a person in authority if they’ve earned that trust because they’re knowledgeable, experienced and skilled. It means we do the research and learn before making a decision. But that doesn’t mean we throw up our hands and give up. It’s okay not to like somebody but give their argument its due.Īppeal to Ignorance: Appealing to ignorance is used more often than you’d think. If this person is arguing, say, why a project must be aware of a certain risk, and you dismiss them because they’re always complaining, you’re making a logical fallacy. There are going to be team members who you personally don’t connect with, even though they excel at their job. Reporting tools and surveys can help you collect the necessary data to avoid hasty generalizations.Īd Hominem: When the listener attacks the person who is advancing the argument and ignores what they’re actually saying. Don’t decide until you have a deep, rich pool of information. It’s making a decision without all the facts having first been gathered and understood in context of the decision you’re making. Hasty Generalization: In short, a hasty generalization is when you neglect to perform your due diligence. How can logical fallacies harm your decision-making process? In myriad ways, but for the sake of brevity we’ll examine seven examples of logical fallacies that should be avoided. A logical fallacy is an incorrect argument in logic and rhetoric that contains a fatal flaw which undermines its soundness, thereby leading to an erroneous, and potentially damaging, conclusion.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |